Reform Wollongong City Council

Encouraging a genuine community conversation on reforming our local government

ALP Greens agreement – full text url

Posted by reformwcc on September 2, 2010

The Australian Greens & The Australian Labor Party (‘The Parties’) – Agreement Between:

The Hon Julia Gillard MP Prime Minister, MP Lalor, Leader of the Australian Labor Party
The Hon Wayne Swan MP
Deputy Prime Minister, MP Lilley, Deputy Leader of the Australian
Labor Party

And

Senator Bob Brown
Senator Christine Milne
Senator for Tasmania, Leader of the Australian Greens
Senator for Tasmania, Deputy Leader of the Australian Greens
Adam Bandt MP ‐elect MP Melbourne, Australian Greens representative in the House

3. Goals

f) Hold referenda during the 43rd Parliament or at the next election on Indigenous constitutional recognition and recognition of local government in the Constitution.

full text of agreement

http://greens.org.au/sites/greens.org.au/files/Final%20Agreement%20_ALP_GRNS.pdf

Posted in reform wcc | Comments Off

Greens – ALP agreement includes referendum on recogition of local government.

Posted by reformwcc on September 2, 2010

While waiting for a Greens media release on this crucial matter, here is a comment from the Northern Star (Northern Rivers area):

“Greens deal offers councils hope

Alex Easton and AAP | 2nd September 2010

A DEAL between Labor and The Greens at the Federal level could signal a new era for local councils, Ballina Greens councillor, Jeff Johnson, said.

A DEAL between Labor and The Greens at the Federal level could signal a new era for local councils, Ballina Greens councillor and former Page candidate, Jeff Johnson, said.

Newly-elected Greens Melbourne MP Adam Bandt yesterday formally sided with Labor in the ongoing battle to see who will form the new Government

” Cr Johnson said one of the most critical concessions, from a Northern Rivers perspective, was an agreement to ‘move towards’ referendum to give constitutional recognition to local councils.

Under existing rules, councils exist at the whim of state governments. That demonstrates itself most visibly in the ability of state governments to force separate councils to amalgamate. But for councils the bigger issue has been ‘cost shifting’ – the practice of passing responsibilities to councils without ensuring they have the funds to cover those responsibilities.

Northern Rivers councils have been pushing to have local government enshrined in the Constitution as a way of escaping the control of state governments.

More importantly, it would pave the way for councils to get their own slice of GST revenue, which would provide secure funding without the need to increase rates or continuously apply for grants to help pay for projects.

“It would mean greater funding for the services councils provide,” Cr Johnson said.

“It’s widely recognised that it (local government) is the most efficient form of service delivery, and we currently get only 3 per cent of funding. ” “

full story
http://www.northernstar.com.au/story/2010/09/02/greens-election-lismore-ballina-council/

Posted in reform wcc | Comments Off

Another one bites the dust

Posted by reformwcc on August 31, 2010

Minister removes council authority

Harvey Grennan
SMH August 31, 2010

CESSNOCK CITY COUNCIL has been stripped of its powers to determine development applications worth more than $1 million after it refused a ministerial direction alleged to be illegal.

“The reasons the minister advances for removing the council’s planning powers are spurious to say the least,” the Greens’ planning spokeswoman, Sylvia Hale, said.

Full story

http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/minister-removes-council-authority-20100830-147ez.html

Posted in reform wcc | Comments Off

DLG – Snapshot – “a great tool for ratepayers” says Minister

Posted by reformwcc on August 25, 2010

Barbara Perry MP Minister for Local Government (Media release) August 16, 2010

Latest council data snapshot released

Minister for Local Government Barbara Perry today released the Snapshot of NSW Councils, a report that shows data for of all 152 councils across key indicators for 2008/09.

The report, based on data supplied by councils to the Division of Local Government, shows councils charged NSW ratepayers an average of $760 in yearly rates in 08/09, an increase from the previous year’s average of $732.

The report found that Hunters Hill Council charged its residents the state’s highest average residential rates of $1203, an increase from $1167 the previous year. Residents of Brewarrina Shire Council were charged the least, with average residential rates of just $98.62.

Ms Perry released the Snapshot of NSW Councils report today saying it provided an important tool for ratepayers.

“Now in its 19th year, this report allows ratepayers across the state to examine what is going on in their local area,” Ms Perry said.

“It provides key information on all councils in NSW and is a great tool for ratepayers and councils.”

Ms Perry said: “With 152 councils across the state, it is fascinating to see the differences in the councils and their communities.”

The full Snapshot of NSW Councils report is available at www.dlg.nsw.gov.au

Also: dlg circular to councils:

Circular No.10/20 Date 23 August 2010 Doc ID.A192564

SNAPSHOT OF NSW COUNCILS – COMPARATIVE INFORMATION ON NSW LOCAL GOVERNMENT COUNCILS 2008/09

The Snapshot of NSW Councils – Comparative Information on NSW Local Government Councils for 2008/09 publication has been released by the Minister for Local Government, the Hon Barbara Perry MP.

A PDF version of this publication, and updated time series data excel spreadsheet, are available by selecting ‘Publications’ and ‘Comparative Information’ on the Division of Local Government’s website at www.dlg.nsw.gov.au.

The information contained in the publication is largely based on data provided by councils. The Division of Local Government makes every effort to ensure that the information contained in the publication is accurate

Ross Woodward
Chief Executive, Local Government
A Division of the Department of Premier and Cabinet
————-

For the document go to:
http://www.dlg.nsw.gov.au/dlg/dlghome/documents/Comparatives/Comparatives_2008_09.pdf

and see also

http://www.dlg.nsw.gov.au/dlg/dlghome/dlg_compIndex.asp?documenttype=comptime&mi=3&ml=2

Posted in reform wcc | Comments Off

Parking meters Out! Administrators Out! NSW ALP Out!

Posted by reformwcc on August 20, 2010

We can thank the NSW ALP for the invasion of parking meters in the Wollongong CBD area.

These unwanted parking meters have caused enormous problems for local businesses and a host of lesser annoyances for a great number of people.

The people of Wollongong did not request these money machines to be placed in our streets. This is not the Wollongong way. Wollongong people have our own culture and our own way of life – and this does not involve parking meters. Nor are parking meters appropriate in a multifocal city of our kind, where we have many different local centres.

It has often been said, during the resulting debate about installing parking meters, that they would never have been possible if we had an elected Council. That most people would agree with this is a real admission that some unelected people sought to bypass the democratic will of the people of Wollongong. As a result the parking meters are the embodiment of bad faith.

These parking meters were forced onto our communities as a result of the ‘alien’ vision of life. The alien vision which the three Administrators brought with them when they arrived here from other places.

Thinking that parking meters worked elsewhere (and there is more that a suggestion that even this is not correct) the Administrators – after having made an initial gross misjudgement – have persisted with an attempt to tough it out.

Clearly the three Administrators thought parking meters for the CBD were a good idea – since no one else did and they alone were calling the shots!

But we must look passed the major failings of the three senior technocrats.

Knowing nothing of the local culture, their limited world-views were empowered by the workings of the NSW ALP government when that government unfairly dismissed our non-corrupt, honest and hard working elected Councillors (which also included some ALP Councillors). The NSW ALP Government appointed these Administrators. This allowed the world-view of three non-Wollongong people to completely override the views of the vast majority of us Wollongongians.

The NSW ALP Government has consistently refused requests to restore democracy to the Wollongong City Council, even if that required having some form of interim period in which any reforms recommended by the ICAC inquiry could be bedded down with an advising Administrator present as well.

While it is clear that the immediate burden of blame for the parking meter fiasco rests at the feet of the three Administrators the longer term blame rests entirely with the NSW ALP Government.

Remember that when the NSW State election comes around.

And when the Council elections finally do restore democracy to our city – vote for those who will remove the unwelcome legacy of the Administrators by removing the parking meters.

Such is the real spirit of our city.

Bruce Reyburn
Coledale

Posted in reform wcc | Comments Off

Local Government and the Federal Election

Posted by reformwcc on August 18, 2010

There are people who say that local government has nothing to do with the Federal election. How wrong they are.

The issue of gaining Constitutional recognition and protection for local government is one which is long overdue for the attention of Australia’s peoples.

Protection includes preventing State government from unfair sacking of non-corrupt elected Councillors, and the need to have immediate by-elections to replace Councillors deemed to be corrupt (or unfit for office) by a competent tribunal or other body. Local democracy at all times needs to be the bottom line.

The need for strong local government, guaranteed a place (and funding) in the system of Australia’s systems of governance, is the need to ground the whole decision-making process in our communities and our actual lives.

Without this grounding our communities interests are regularly sidelined and factored out by Federal representatives who are themselves captive to their political parties. Their primary allegiance is not to their local constituency but to the power brokers within their own parties who hold the keys to preselection and other benefits flowing from access to power.

These political parties, dinosaurs from a previous age, are easy targets for commercial and other exploitative forces which do not have our communities best interests at heart.

Strong local government, charged with looking after our communities best interests, is part of the corrective counter-balance to these exploitative forces.

A key part of a design for effective and strong local government is the inclusion of democratic community committees (of the Precinct Committee or Community Board type), which can supplement (but not replace) the roles and duties of elected Councillors. These community committees need to be about the size of Wards.

This key feature must also be part of a people’s model of local government in any Constitutional reform.

It is not surprising that the major political parties are silent on the issue of Constitution recognition for local government in the present election campaign. A few members of a political party have greatly concentrated power and a very unhealthy ability to insert their will for that of the Australian people (as we just saw with how those in the ALP deposed PM Rudd).

These political power brokers and the even the elected Members of Parliament who are major party members, are not our champions, and never will be unless people demand that they take effective and real action to bring a dangerously unearthed system of governance back down to ground by empowering local communities.

The parking meter fiasco in Wollongong clearly shows what can happen without protection for elected and accountable local government.

Local government issues not part of the Federal election? Think again.

Ask your local candidates just what they propose to do, if elected, to ensure Constitutional recognition and protection for local government.

Cheers

Bruce Reyburn
18 August 2010

Posted in reform wcc | Comments Off

Illawarra Mercury “Illawarra council rates among dearest in NSW”

Posted by reformwcc on August 18, 2010

BY LAUREL-LEE RODERICK Illawarra Mercury
18 Aug, 2010

Minister for Local Government Barbara Perry this week released a report card comparing the state’s 152 councils for 2008-09.

Wollongong and Shellharbour councils also recorded residential rates well above the NSW average of $760, to be ranked 14th and 22nd respectively.

Residential rates averaged $944 in Wollongong and $864 in Shellharbour

In Wollongong, spending on community services – such as child care, youth and family services – averaged just $21 per person.

Wollongong spent $35 per person on the environment and health, …

full story and comparisons with other Illawarra Councils at:
http://www.illawarramercury.com.au/news/local/news/general/illawarra-council-rates-among-dearest-in-nsw/1915853.aspx

Posted in reform wcc | Comments Off

Update on dogs on beaches

Posted by reformwcc on August 5, 2010

From Office of the General Manager to CCNC/NF2 August meeting, in response to question from July meeting:

“Council has just finalised an initial review of Environmental Factors for dogs on beaches and is discussing the details with a number of agencies.The
forum will be notified as soon as a decision is made.”

How about discussing the details with a number of Neighbourhood Forums as well?

Posted in reform wcc | Comments Off

And now … for something similar in NSW

Posted by reformwcc on July 29, 2010

From AVAAZ

Dear friends,

A massive online campaign by the Avaaz community in Brazil has just won a stunning victory against corruption.

The “clean record” law was a bold proposal that banned any politician convicted of crimes like corruption and money laundering from running for office. With nearly 25% of the Congress under investigation for corruption, most said it would never pass. But after Avaaz launched the largest online campaign in Brazilian history, helping to build a petition of over 2 million signatures, 500,000 online actions, and tens of thousands of phone calls, we won!

Avaaz members fought corrupt congressmen daily as they tried every trick in the book to kill, delay, amend, and weaken the bill, and won the day every time. The bill passed Congress, and already over 330 candidates for office face disqualification!

One Brazilian member wrote to us when the law was passed, saying:

I have never been as proud of the Brazilian people as I am today! Congratulations to all that have signed. Today I feel like an actual citizen with political power. — Silvia

Our strategy in Brazil was simple: make a solution so popular and visible that it can’t be opposed, and be so vigilant that we can’t be ignored.

This victory shows what our community can do – at a national level, in developing nations, and on the awful problem of corruption. Anywhere in the world, we can build legislative proposals to clean up corruption in government, back them up with massive citizen support, and fight legislators who try to block them.

France’s Le Monde called our “impressive and unprecedented petition” campaign a “spectacular political and moral victory for civil society.” And while this victory may be a first, we can make it the precedent for global citizen action.

Amazingly, our entire Brazil campaign was made possible by just a couple of Avaaz team members, serving over 600,000 Avaaz members in Brazil. The power of the Avaaz model is that technology can enable a tiny team to help millions of people work together on the most pressing issues. It’s one of the most powerful ways a small donation can make a difference in the world.

5.6 million of us are reading this email — if a small fraction of us donate just $3 or $5 per week, or 50 cents per day, the entire Avaaz team will be funded and we can even expand our work on corruption and a range of issues. Click below to become a Sustainer of Avaaz and help take our anti-corruption campaigning global:

https://secure.avaaz.org/en/ficha_limpa_reportback/?vl

We’ve seen the heart-wrenching movies about street kids and desperate urban poverty in Brazil, and we know that across the world political corruption preys on our communities and saps human potential. In Brazil, our community has helped turn the tide and usher in a new era of transparent, accountable politics. Let’s seize the opportunity and begin to fight corruption everywhere it’s needed today.

With hope,

Ricken, Luis, Graziela, David, Ben, Maria Paz, Benjamin and the entire Avaaz Team

SOURCES:

The Economist, “Cleaning up. A campaign against corruption”:

http://www.avaaz.org/economist_ficha_limpa

The Rio Times, “Anti-Corruption Law in Effect This Year”:

http://www.avaaz.org/rio_times_ficha_limpa

The story of Brazil’s Clean Record law has yet to be told widely in English language media. Here are a few stories in other languages that capture the campaign:

Le Monde, “Operation “clean sheet” in Brazil”: (French)

http://www.avaaz.org/le_monde_ficha_limpa

Correio Braziliense, “The arrival of 2.0 activists”: (Portuguese)

http://www.avaaz.org/correio_braziliense_2_0

Posted in reform wcc | Comments Off

Role of Council Officers at Neighbourhood Forums

Posted by reformwcc on July 23, 2010

At the last Neighbourhood Forum i attended (NF2 July) i gained the distinct impression that the new attending Council officer was attempting to tell me how i should think, and she sought to argue the toss with me about some important matters of record and of process.

I consider this kind of attitude quite out of line. The previous Council officer had understood very well what her role was. The role of the attending Council officer is to act as a liaison between our community and Council, ensuring a timely flow of information.

They are not active participants in community discussion (see the WCC media release below which stresses that NFs are independent from Council).

The new Council officer also seemed not to understand that when we request information from Council her job is simply to make an accurate record of it and process it. Doing this is not at her discretion.

The WCC Neighbourhood Charter says:

Format of meetings

Each Neighbourhood Forum meeting will be run according to the following format and allow for a maximum two [2] hours duration of any meeting:
· The meetings will be attended by a Council officer.
· Discussion will be about Council related business.
· The Council officer will provide information, record issues for action and provide follow up information.
· The Council officer will act as a liaison between meeting participants and Council where required.

10 Minutes

The Council Officer will not record minutes of each session however a record of actions required will be made on an Action Template. The actions will be responded to by an appropriate Council Officer. Council will send the completed Action Template to the Neighbourhood Chair and members of the Neighbourhood Forum. The completed Action Template will also be placed on Council’s Website. The Council Officer will also endeavour to address each action at the next meeting.

Posted in reform wcc | Comments Off