A correspondent has asked:
“Your latest on Campbell and Precincts appears to assume that your model will tolerate potential political corruption as long as the precincts have power and resources?
Alternately, how do you think that the next elected Council will not contain a majority of political submissiveness to Sussex street?”
In order to widen the community debate (what do you think) here is my answer:
Well, i can’t see us getting Precinct Committees (resourced or otherwise) any time real soon so what we are facing is a lack of any form of democratically elected representation at the local government level (until 2012) as we head into the uncharted waters of a deepening global crisis.
Nor will the potential political corruption you mention disappear from the mainstream of life where it is well and truly entrenched. It is not a matter of tolerating it so much as having to live with it in order to address some other pressing problems. What’s the alternative? I don’t sense a major change happening across the State – a great many people are bunkering down and seeking to preserve the status quo.
Many of us live for the day when the ALP no longer dominates WCC – and our collective forebrain can start of operate for a truly creative Wollongong – but that can only come when a majority of voting people in a majority of Wards agree with us.
There has a been a long process working towards such an outcome – and working in a democratic spirit. Erosion appears to operate faster – but change does happen.
However, yes, if we had good Precinct Committees then Council, as a form of organisation, would be more corruption resistant. But it’s just not going to happen at this time – people are only just starting to work through the paper tiger Mark3 of Neighbourhood Forums, and the electorate is very very conservative when it comes to local government reform.
Precinct Committees would also serve to counter the power which comes from Sussex Street – but that is up to the local people to ensure that the ALP (or any other major political party) does not dominate Precinct Committees in those areas where the ALP tends to dominate.
Careful design attention of Precinct Committees is required to enable local people so they can participate effectively. This itself requires a real commitment from those who are directing Council resources. The former WCC Neighbourhood Committees were starved of all manner of resources.
Same thing is happening with NFs now – after all, it is only the appearance of community consultation that those empowered by the present arrangements require – not the substance.
ADMINSTRATORS AND GENERAL MANAGER AS “LEADERS”?
I cannot endorse the situation in which our communities interests in crucial matters at this time (or any time) are represented by three State appointed Administrators and/or Council’s careerist General Manager.
With the best of will on their part, they can never do any other than substitute their own very limited own world view for the informed opinion which results from having genuine hard-working elected representatives.
The Administrators and General Manager follow their own life narratives, and (given their success) it is clear they have made careful choices of the kind which advance particular interests. They just are not ‘leaders’. That type of approach is not the same as one which is required to present itself to the full electorate and to under public scrutiny.
There is a vast world of difference between the type of spirit elected representatives bring to such negotiations and those which result in a successful bureacratic career.
NEXT ELECTED COUNCIL
In terms of the next elected Council i would say, given the composition of the Wollongong voting population, that there is a very good chance that the next elected Council contain a majority of political submissiveness to Sussex Street.
While i am not happy about that if that is the informed choice of the people of Wollongong, that’s democracy for you – and you then have to deal with the issues as they arise without enjoying a Council with a ‘free’ choice. Same as it ever was.
I can’t see major political parties being banned from overt participation in local government here at this time. It’s not even on the discussional agenda.
It is unclear to me how the ICAC finding about caucusing may change ALP decision-making practices. Do you know?
You will recall that there were a large number of non-corrupt hard working Councillors in the previous WCC Council. Not all ALP Councillors were found to have acted corruptly. A majority of Councillors, then, were not corrupt and they should never have been sacked.
We need proper democratically-based representation at this time in order to get the best outcomes for people in our communities.
BOTTOM LINE
In lieu of real reforms at the present time, I place my faith in the voting people in Wollongong to be able to elect who they want to represent us at the Council level (and to correct any major problems which arise, when they arise).
Bottom line – we require to be represented by democratically elected Councillors at this time – and at all times. Any particular problem has to be dealt with as it arrises.
Taking away our local government representation is never acceptable.
cheers
Bruce
PS Amend the Australian Constitution to entrench democratic local government representation as a right (and to do so with a local government model which has fair dinkum Precinct Committees as a key design feature) .
Like this:
Be the first to like this post.