Reform Wollongong City Council

Encouraging a genuine community conversation on reforming our local government

Archive for December, 2009

local change – some global considerations – peoples movement

Posted by reformwcc on December 30, 2009

While waiting to hear what His Holiness the Dalia Lama said about these matters (Our Future – Who is responsible?) during his visit to Australia and New Zealand/Aotearoa in December, here is some interesting (and short) holiday reading:

“The Great Turning: From Empire to Earth Community” by David Korten at url

http://www.yesmagazine.org/article.asp?ID=1463

See also

This Is About Us
Posted December 14, 2009
The talks at Copenhagen are not just about climate change. They represent a battle to redefine humanity.

By George Monbiot. Published in the Guardian 15th December 2009

http://www.monbiot.com/archives/2009/12/14/this-is-about-us/

And, for something NEW which you won’t read elsewhere check out my “New Design” materials (see page tab above) written in early 2008. I may follow these two pieces up with a third piece early in 2010.

http://reformwcc.info/?page_id=794

Posted in reform wcc | Comments Off

ABC RN Background Briefing – Controlling Corruption

Posted by reformwcc on December 27, 2009

Controlling corruption

ABC radio national – Background Briefing
Sunday 27 December 2009

Out of the Fitzgerald Inquiry, the National Integrity System was born, and is now used by governments and authorities in most countries around the world. The latest is Kurdistan. Corruption, like death and taxes, is inevitable. Ian Townsend explores ways in which it can be managed and minimised.

Conclusion:

“Ian Townsend: There will always be people in power who will be tempted to abuse it. Professor Charles Sampford says the key is to recognise that, and design governments that can be run by people who aren’t perfect.

Charles Sampford: I think some people have an image of an ethical person as somebody who with all the temptations, with all the pressures in the world, does the right thing at great sacrifice. We never have enough of them to fill a cabinet room, let alone man every beat or every social welfare office, and so what we should really do is try to design institutions that can be run by ordinary people, because I think that if you have to rely on people being saints, then in that case there just will never be enough saints to go around. And the other thing is, that probably if saints stood for election, they probably wouldn’t be chosen. So overall, let’s design institutions that don’t need saints to run them.

Audio and transcript at:

http://www.abc.net.au/rn/backgroundbriefing/

Note list of resource links at end of transcript.

Have a quick look at diagram at:

http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/nis

I may critique this ‘vertical’ approach from the viewpoint of indigenous Australian wisdom in the near future – Bruce

Posted in reform wcc | Comments Off

Peoples reform movement – sharing a reply with a correspondent

Posted by reformwcc on December 20, 2009

(This is my reply to a correspondent regarding a peoples reform movement, which may be of interest to others).

Hi…,

There is a really good opportunity to pursue these ideas with the course running at UoW and i am sure most of those attending and participating are interested in changing the present system.

One of the problems often encountered in this situation (in my experience) is that most of such a group of people have little, if any, experience with the actual experiment with WCC Neighbourhood
Committees (or now, Nieghbourhood Forums) and the need to improve on that model by making use of the hard-won lessons gained from the many years of attending monthly meetings.

My hunch is that John Hatton is not one of these people – and that he may well understand the history of Precinct Committees as pioneered by Ted Mack (as Lord Mayor of North Sydney) as well as having a long history of involvement in community based groups and local politics.

For me the reform process has to include the re-centering of decision-making back into the heart of our communities. And this requires considerable thought and discussion as to how this can happen
so that it too is accountable, transparent and has minimal risk of corruption.

Problem is, as i said, many of the high-fliers who seek to provide ‘leadership’ to the process of change seem to regard attending the monthly meeting as below them. So they lack real experience where it
counts. They are ‘on another level’ – and this level can fail to appreciate the finer points upon which life turns. They leave ‘us’ out of their vision.

Gaining recognition of the ‘fourth’ level of government – the community level – is not on their radars, but without this level of grounding of the decision-making process we merely set things up so
another unearthed elite can mismanage our community business.

NEED A PARADIGM SHIFT TO “EARTH” DECISION-MAKING

What we need (to restore a degree of balance into our lives presently reeling under the massive spin of all manner of influences) is a paradigm shift, away from any form of ‘top-down’ elitism and to a more ‘horizontal’ system which engages with the everyday people in our communities when it comes to governmental decision-making.

These are my views – and i put them forward not as THE solution but to encourage more community based discussion.

Not so sure about a colour revolution – there is one in waiting in the wings given the crisis in government in NSW (can we add the failure of leaders at the Copenhagen conference to take real action on climate change???) – since an orange revolution, say, may merely result in a circulation of elites, and not result in real community empowerment.

TIMEFRAME – BETWEEN NOW AND THE NEXT WCC ELECTION?

There is a State election at some stage (presently 2011) and this provides an opportunity for candidates who are committed to reform the Local Government Act to ensure that people like us are not denied our democratic rights for elected Council representation at all times and to provide official recognition (and protection) of properly resources Precinct Committees as part of Council. (and a whole host of reform agenda matters).

In terms of the opportunity between here and the next Wollongong Council election (in Sept 2012) there is a great opportunity for an ongoing community conversation so that the candidates for the next Wollongong Council will have policies which include fair-dinkum Precinct Committees – policies which they will implement once a majority of them have been elected by an informed electorate.

The 2011 State election provides a good means to get some of these issues on the discussional agenda.

cheers

Bruce

Posted in reform wcc | Comments Off

More sophistry from the NSW ALP re 2010 local government election in Wollongong

Posted by reformwcc on December 19, 2009

Read the letter on behalf of the Minister for Local Government and form your own opinion.

http://reformwcc.info/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/dlg20091210.pdf

Consider these points:

1. We did not have a local government election in the previous round – but we paid our taxes and rates. Therefore there is no extra cost incurred by having an election in 2010 and 2012.

2. Even if there was an extra cost for such an election, what price is local democracy? How does that cost compare with the expense accounts of senior civic servants?

3. Neither the Minister for Local Government nor the three Administrators can provide a single example of the reforms which they are supposedly putting in place between now and 2012, let alone a single objective criteria by which we will know when these supposed reforms will have achieved their goal, nor a single timetable which spells out the reform process in the slightest detail. Conclusion – pure smoke screen sophistry from NSWALP politicians and their public servants.

4, Now that the extensive and fully resourced ICAC Inquiry is over, the grounds for dismissing ALL our elected Councillors can no longer be used as a means to justify denying the people of Wollongong elected representatives at the Council level. There is not one criminal charge against former WCC Councillors relating to governance matters.

And a final letter from David Campbell, as Minister for the Illawarra.

http://reformwcc.info/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/DCampbell20091201.pdf

Thanks David, it seems to have got the Department of Local Government working.

Posted in reform wcc | Comments Off

thinking of a Colour Revolution – community discussion required

Posted by reformwcc on December 19, 2009

On the question of Colour Revolutions

Do they result in genuinely empowering people and community – or merely replace one elite with another as a means of ‘regime change’?

Try a google search on ‘color revolutions’ – some argue that the old guard is replaced with a new guard, but not with a genuine paradigm shift in terms of empowering people-in-community.

As good a starting place as any for some “supplementary reading”, see – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colour_revolution

And also:

“In his new book, “Full Spectrum Dominance: Totalitarian Democracy in the New World Order,” F. William Engdahl explained a new form of US covert warfare – first played out in Belgrade, Serbia in 2000. What appeared to be “a spontaneous and genuine political ‘movement,’ (in fact) was the product of techniques” developed in America over decades.

In the 1990s, RAND Corporation strategists developed the concept of “swarming” to explain “communication patterns and movement of” bees and other insects which they applied to military conflict by other means. More on this below.

In Belgrade, key organizations were involved, including the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), the International Republican Institute (IRI), and National Democratic Institute. Posing as independent NGOS, they’re, in fact, US-funded organizations charged with disruptively subverting democracy and instigating regime changes through non-violent strikes, mass street protests, major media agitprop, and whatever else it takes short of military conflict. “

Full article:

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=14168

Life is rich, indeed.

Posted in reform wcc | Comments Off

Administrators – if this is Tuesday we must be in Wollongong

Posted by reformwcc on December 19, 2009

“Gabrielle Kibble resigns from Wollongong council

BY LAUREL-LEE RODERICK

19 Dec, 2009 04:00 AM

Juggling four senior public service roles simultaneously has taken its toll on Gabrielle Kibble, prompting her resignation as one of Wollongong City Council’s three administrators.

Minister for Local Government Barbara Perry yesterday announced Mrs Kibble’s resignation and the appointment of a retired council chief, Richard Colley, to replace her.

Mrs Kibble told the Mercury yesterday that she was “probably more busy than I had anticipated” since accepting positions as the chair of the NSW Planning Assessment Commission late last year and the chair of the western region Joint Regional Planning Panel in the middle of this year.

She is also the chair of the NSW Heritage Council.

“The major things which were part of my brief in Wollongong, largely speaking, are now achieved,” she said.

“I think council is well equipped to go on and I certainly wish it well.”

In an uncharacteristic slip-up during a post-council meeting press conference last week, Mrs Kibble referred to a development in Liverpool before quickly correcting herself to say Wollongong. Mrs Kibble was the administrator of Liverpool City Council until late last year.

Mr Farmer said she had encouraged council staff to create concise plans and documents and helped staff move forward from ICAC.

Mrs Kibble’s replacement, Mr Colley, was the commissioner of a public inquiry into Shellharbour City Council in 2008 that led to the council being dismissed and replaced with an administrator.

He had a marketing background before taking up a position at Bankstown City Council in 1995 and was general manager at Bankstown from 1999 to 2007.

full story

http://www.illawarramercury.com.au/news/local/news/general/gabrielle-kibble-resigns-from-wollongong-council/1709524.aspx?storypage=1

See also Illawarra Mercury poll on whether or not you are satisfied with the job Administrators are doing at WCC.

Posted in reform wcc | Comments Off

Stockland – NSW ALP – and *part* of the answer is:

Posted by reformwcc on December 18, 2009

“Revealed: ALP donor projects Keneally approved
JOSEPHINE TOVEY Sydney Morning Herald December 14, 2009

KRISTINA KENEALLY personally approved at least three contentious development applications by major Labor Party donors as minister for planning, despite promising they would be determined by an independent panel.

In January she approved two Stockland developments in Vincentia, on the South Coast, and in October she signed off on an industrial facility in Erskine Park being built by one of her party’s biggest donors, Jacfin.

The moves contradicted one of her earliest promises when she took over the planning portfolio from Frank Sartor last year, to pass all such decisions to an independent panel called the Planning Assessment Commission.

In an effort to defuse ongoing controversy about political donations influencing planning approvals, Ms Keneally issued a statement on November 6 last year, promising: “The commission will play a significant role in depoliticising the planning system by standing in the shoes of the minister and determining all development applications where a developer has made a political donation within the past two years.”

Despite this, she approved two Stockland developments in Vincentia: the first stage of a new shopping centre on January 7 and a retirement village on January 28.

Between 2003 and 2007, Stockland donated $105,000 to NSW Labor.

….

In the wake of the Wollongong development scandal, the Government amended the laws on October 1 last year and required that all reportable political donations (those exceeding $1000) had to be declared when lodging a development application.

Because the Jacfin and Stockland applications were lodged before October 1, they did not include such declarations.

”At the time the application was lodged, the minister of planning was the consent authority and that was how the project was assessed and determined,” a spokesman for Ms Keneally said.

The Opposition’s spokesman on planning, Brad Hazzard, said Ms Keneally should have delegated the matters regardless.”

full SMH story:

http://www.smh.com.au/national/revealed-alp-donor-projects-keneally-approved-20091213-kqhk.html

Posted in reform wcc | Comments Off

Question for Premier Keneally – how much money flows from Stockland to the NSW ALP?

Posted by reformwcc on December 16, 2009

“Govt’s green light for Sandon Point
BY LAUREL-LEE RODERICK
16 Dec, 2009 Illawarra Mercury

Stockland’s $22 million residential subdivision at Sandon Point has been approved by the State Government, paving the way for more than 180 houses and 80 apartments to be constructed on the controversial site.

The NSW Department of Planning’s deputy director-general Richard Pearson will today officially announce the approval of the 181-lot residential subdivision and one super-lot where up to 80 units could be constructed.

Planning documents indicate that the approval was granted by former planning minister Kristina Keneally on November 29 – only two days after new legislation was passed to rezone 20.5ha of the site for residential development.

Four days later, Ms Keneally became the state’s first female premier after Nathan Rees was rolled in a leadership challenge.

The Mercury revealed last week that the Sandon Point site had been quietly rezoned under the State Environmental Planning Policy (Major Development) Amendment (Sandon Point) 2009. The legislation overrides council planning controls and other State Government planning policies.”

full story
http://www.illawarramercury.com.au/news/local/news/general/govts-green-light-for-sandon-point/1705877.aspx

Posted in reform wcc | Comments Off

Is a genuine peoples reform movement possible?

Posted by reformwcc on December 13, 2009

With the increasing breakdown of the workings of the 20th century forms of organisation, where can we turn to for new ideas about how to empower our communities?

The old forms of organisation, from political parties to formal organisations with constitutions and meeting etc to Council and governments, have shown that they are no match for the social and ecological challenges which presently face us.

For those of us who reject master narratives from the Left, such as Marxism, and the Right, such as Capitalism, we ask:

* What would a genuine peoples reform movement look like?

* How would it operate?

* What lessons can we learn from the past about which mistakes to avoid?

These questions, and others, require community discussion and considered debate.

A NETWORK – FOR SHARING INFORMATION

Part of the answer may lie with networks of people who are active in their communities, but who want to move beyond political parties and the tired old forms of political organisation of the 20th century.

These new networks – as flows of information and ideas for action – would need to operate without the usual meeting procedures by which the creative part of the brain is dominated by the administrative part – that is, dominated by that part which is part of the problem and not part of the solution.

With the increasing chaos resulting from those who function by way of meeting procedures (think – “men in suits”) we will be increasingly pressured into the idea that we need yet another formal organisation, political party or similar.

We need to resist this kind of pressure – and move on to something which keeps our decision making centred both in our guts and in the guts of our community, not in the hands of yet another elite.

A peoples movement is a movement of people who are moved by the same spirit – a peoples movement is not a cast of thousands of extras in the unearthed fantasies of others.

Keep all options open, and resist those who seek to panic us into accepting their own dangerous delusions that they are born to solve our problems, if only we would cede our decision-making powers to them. This is not the way to go.

The healing solution is a full-brainer, with both parts of our brain working in partnership. Those from the Left and the Right do not understand this.

HOW CAN OUR INSTITUTIONS SERVE OUR REAL NEEDS?

Rather than seeking to reinvent the wheel, a peoples movement – as a network of shared information – would do well to make full use of existing community based resources such as, in the case of Wollongong, the Neighbourhood Forums. This keeps things well and truly grounded.

And one key question for a peoples movement is this:

“How can we best reform the existing forms of local, state and national governance so they properly balance community concerns with those of others which merely seek to make a quick profit, one way or the other, at our expense?”

The answer lies within all of us – we just need to learn how to link up to share the bits of the puzzle we each have.

Posted in reform wcc | Comments Off

Petition to change constitution to reclaim our vote

Posted by reformwcc on December 12, 2009

RECLAIM YOUR VOTE

“We, the people, believe the State of NSW is being neglected….we are calling for a change to the constitution to enable this to happen. We demand a referendum on this at the next State election.”

Registered NSW voters can sign this petition in the AFFIRMATIVE by entering a valid email address

You will be sent an email to complete the petition.

Full text:

http://polls.smh.com.au/index.php?sid=36127&lang=en

See also – from Sydney Morning Herald:

“It’s time the people of NSW were heard
December 11, 2009

It is time for the people of NSW to take a stand, to say enough is enough. The politics of NSW has ceased to be concerned mainly with the delivery of services or about its development and the welfare of its citizens, and has turned into an expression of the Labor Party’s civil war.”

http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politics/its-time-the-people-of-nsw-were-heard-20091210-kmbf.html

Posted in reform wcc | Comments Off

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.