Prehaps in contrast to some other groups forming at this time, a Community Democracy Movement has, as its fundamental aim, the empowerment of local communities in the decision-making process of government..
That is, the fundamental aim is the real empowerment of local communities in the decision-making processes of all levels of government – local, state and federal (and regional if and when we move to that level of government).
This is a non-negotiable aim, and such matters as getting better Councillors (and better elected MPs) are secondary.
SMALL STEPS
Clearly such a movement needs to begin with small steps while it develops the competencies and procedures to handle community business in a democratic and responsible manner.
In Wollongong we now have almost 20 years of such direct experience via the former WCC Neighbourhood Committees, Local Area Meetings and Neighbourhood Forums. Some ‘experts’ (who were not part of the local effort) discount the value of this hard won experience. They need to come up to speed.
The new design has to result in new forms of structured, democratic and responsible means of local community participation. It may take decades of trial and error to get this mix right.
For this reason, the initial stress is on looking at the means by which local communities can become part of the decision-making processes of local government.
NEED FOR DIVISION OF DECISION-MAKING LABOUR
Since the philosophy of community democracy is for local communities to supplement and complement the other levels of government, it is clear that there would need to be some kind of division of labour in the respective decision-making roles of the various levels.
Those levels which presently regard themselves as ‘higher’ need to be reconceptualised as being merely more remote and abstract, and therefore subject to better controls from our communities. They are not ‘higher’ at all, just more likely to be bought off by powerful forces which systematically undervalue the sort of things in life we hold near and dear.
The aim is to bring those ‘unearthed’ levels of decision-making back into contact with our real lives and real local communities.
WHAT ARE THE APPROPRIATE AREAS FOR LOCAL DECISION-MAKING?
The early Community Reform Agenda has already spelt out some of the types of decision-making for the Precinct Committee/Community Board level. This is in need of review. But make no mistake. This is about reclaiming power for our communities – not merely an academic exercise – and hence a power struggle.
Some examples of the local level of decision-making include setting local budgeting and works priorities; community-based approval processes for minor and major development applications (subject to expert advice); acting as trustees for community lands; and generally serving to restore balance and well-being to life and to protect our communities interests from all manner of exploitative forces.
NOT MERELY IMPROVING THE COMMUNITY CONSULTATION PROCESS
The Community Democracy Movement is not about retaining the old form of Council and merely improving the means of community consultation.
It is about redesigning Council by instituting our local communities firmly into the decision-making process,
Yep, it’s a new paradigm – which seeks to connect people-in-community with the decisions made in our name. And as such will require a real effort to overcome some of the inertia which underpins the old paradigm.
But the ground is already moving due to the old paradigm’s poorly designed foundations.