Reform Wollongong City Council

Encouraging a genuine community conversation on reforming our local government

Archive for September, 2011

Registration form for WCC Community Summit

Posted by reformwcc on September 29, 2011

From WCC:

“Council is seeking interested community members who would like to work with Council to create the vision for our city.

We are holding a Community Summit on 29-30 October 2011 at Wollongong Town Hall. A range of activities will be held over 1 1/2 days which will allow Councillors and the community to partner and develop the visions for the Community Strategic Plan. We aim to attract people from diverse walks of life, whose views will be representative of the whole community.

The information gathered at the Community Summit will then be used to create the Wollongong 2022: Community Strategic Plan, which will not only set out the community’s vision but guide the work of the Council for the next 10 years.

To be considered for the Summit, interested people are asked to complete the Community Summit Registration Form. In the event that Council receives a high number of expressions of interest, a quota for the panel will be set and alternate methods will be offered to allow input into the process.

To register please visit www.wollongong.nsw.gov.au/Wollongong2022

For further information please contact Community Engagement on 4227 7096 or e-mail consultation@wollongong.nsw.gov.au.

We look forward to hearing from you.”

Posted in reform wcc | Comments Off

Online registration for Community Summit – soon

Posted by reformwcc on September 28, 2011

Wollongong 2022: Community Strategic Plan

Community Summit – 29 & 30 October, free workshops at the Town Hall

Wollongong City Council advises me:

“We are currently finalising the details of the Community Summit and anticipate that the registration forms will be on-line by the end of this week.”

So check out the Wollongong 2022: Community Strategic Plan webpage later in the week:

http://www.wollongong.nsw.gov.au/council/publicdocuments/Pages/Wollongong2022.aspx

Posted in reform wcc | Comments Off

Looking beyond Destination 2036 Action Plan

Posted by reformwcc on September 27, 2011

“The longest journey begins with the first step” is a very well known saying.

According to the list of attendees from various Councils, the first step on the journey from Wollongong to Destination 2036 was taken when our area was represented by WCC General Manager at the recent workshop in Dubbo. The reason for his attendance was, of course, that we did not have elected Councillors at that time.

For all his professional abilities as a General Manager, I have not noticed any real commitment from him (during the absence of elected Councillors) towards such matters as empowering Neighbourhood Forums to function as Neighbourhood Committees in order to better manage community business. These committees are typically viewed as a nuisance by bureaucrats, who seek (consciously or unconsciously) to protect their own patch.

So I am not sure what spirit was taken from Wollongong to Dubbo for the Destination 2036 workshop. The needs of Council as a bureaucracy would have been well represented, but what else? Clearly the voices of community champions, such as former Councillors Dave Martin and Alice Cartan, were absent from the Wollongong representation.

The Destination 2036 Outcomes report contains a lot of various concerns and objectives raised from the Dubbo workshop. It is a very complex document. There is some passing mention of the sort of thing – fair dinkum community engagement in Council decision-making – which is the main focus of reformwcc.

But this passing mention is as a side issue, not something which informs the core of the thinking in the report. This is reflected in the way the next stage of the Destination 2036 project is planned – the Action Plan.

Councillors and Council staff are encouraged to read and comment on the Action Plan, but no provision is made for input from our communities at this stage.

Once the Councillors and Council staff have made their comments, a finalised Action Plan will be available for consultation with stakeholders. We may get a look in (along with other stakeholders) at that stage.

In my experience, once these planning documents have their core values cemented securely in place (by politicians and bureaucrats) no amount of “community consultation” will produce any real changes. “Finalised” is the word, with real resistance to any changes to the conceptual architecture in place.

For any talk of ‘partnership’ with community to be meaningful, there has to be a spirit of partnership present – and implemented – from the very outset.

My quick assessment is that, in the majority of thinking in the present Outcomes document, effective and meaningful community participation in Council decision-making is very much a minor side issue.

Generally speaking the thinking contained in the initial Outcomes document is based on an obsolete ‘vertical’ form of ‘modern’ organisation. The second half of the 20th century saw these flourish. They are command structures, separated from their community surroundings, and which seek top-down control.

What is required, if we are to effectively meet present and emerging challenges (with some problems partly as a consequence of the shortcomings of ‘vertical’ forms of organisation) are new forms of organisation which shift from control to relating – that is, from a ‘vertical’ form of organisation to ‘horizontal’ forms.

To put it bluntly, for a document which seeks to sketch out the path for the next 25 years, it is dominated by 20th century ‘vertical’ organisation thinking which is not well placed to plan for that journey.

The terrain to be covered between 2011 and 2036 is very different from that which has been in place for the life of the present Wollongong City Council (formed circa 1947 and replacing smaller and personal organisational forms such as Bulli Council).

All the indicators are that life for people in places like Wollongong over the coming quarter century period is going to be very different to that which was enjoyed in the Western world from the 1950s until the present. We are now witnessing the collapse of that standard of living. Things are rapidly changing at this very moment. We will need to find new ways of living.

WHERE DOES THIS LEAVE US?

Clearly there is now an opportunity for our newly elected Councillor to come up to speed with yet another major report (but they must be also seriously overloaded with the backlog placed on them). Hopefully a good number of the new Councillors will take the time to read the Destination 2036 Outcomes report and will take an active interest in the next phases.

What is needed is some action now to move beyond a closed shop approach and to bring in genuine community participation in the whole process – before it proceeds down a bureaucratic path to ‘finalisation’.

For all the surprises represented by the O’Farrell government, there is virtually no chance that the State Government local government department (still dominated by senior bureaucrats from the pervious era) will alter its timetable to widen out the initial process in order to enable informed community participation.

As things are shaping up for those of us who regard the spirit of partnership as something more than a catchy phrase – that is, as a vital ingredient in a new organisational design – the long journey we are on may not be on the same path as that contained in the thinking of Destination 2036 Outcomes Report and the timetable of the Implementation Steering Committee for finalisation of an Action Plan.

Replacing the obsolete ‘vertical’ organisation thinking at the core of decision-making (at all levels) is a far more important objective over the coming decade if we are to meet life’s challenges.

As the socio-economic climate changes around us – along with the actual climate – achieving this objective will become far easier. Managers will realise that effective community involvement in decision-making is a key part of getting solutions as right as possible (and making the most of available resources).

The time to be experimenting with better models for local government in the Wollongong area – models which have such features as Ward based community council liaison officers assisting Ward Councillors and Ward Based Precinct Committees – is now – with the aim of having a proven and greatly improved community-centred model for Wollongong Council in place well before 2036 – maybe by 2022?

COMMUNITY BASED ACTION PLAN

1. Accurately identify the blockages to genuine community-based reform of the model of local governement.

2 Gently but firmly dissolve those blockages.

Posted in reform wcc | Comments Off

Destination 2036 Update – where do we fit in?

Posted by reformwcc on September 26, 2011

Premier and Cabinet
Division of Local Government
Circular to Councils
Circular No. 11-28
Date 21 September 2011
Doc ID. A258106

“DESTINATION 2036 UPDATE
The purpose of this circular is to advise that the Destination 2036 Outcomes Report has now been released, and to also set out the proposed process and timeframe for consultation and preparation of the related Action Plan.

The Destination 2036 Outcomes Report

A copy of the Destination 2036 Outcomes Report is attached to this circular. It would be appreciated if General Managers can arrange for a printed copy of the report for all councillors and to distribute this circular widely among staff. I encourage all councillors and council staff to review and consider this important report. The Implementation Steering Committee will be writing directly to all councillors in this regard.

Section 4 of the report contains the following draft Vision, which was developed at the workshop:

Strong Communities through Partnerships

By 2036, all NSW communities will be healthy and prosperous – led and served by strong, effective and democratically elected local government.

Through leadership, local knowledge and partnerships with community, government and other sectors, we will plan our futures and deliver quality services and infrastructure. We will be recognised, respected and responsible for:
* Upholding the highest ethical standards
* Sound financial management
* Sensitive environmental stewardship
* Meaningful community engagement, advocacy and leadership
* Our adaptability, innovation and learning
* Developing the full potential of our people
* Responding to our diverse cultures and environments
* Creating places that people value

Outlined below is the process and draft timeframe that the ISC has agreed upon for developing the Action Plan:

Wed 21st Sept Destination 2036 Outcomes Report released
21st Sept – 4th Nov Stakeholders to consider Destination 2036 Outcomes Report
ISC to prepare first draft of the Action Plan
Friday 4th Nov comments on the draft Vision and priorities for the Action Plan are due
7th Nov – 16th Nov ISC to finalise draft Action Plan
Mon 21st Nov Draft Action Plan released for consultation
21st Nov – 30th Dec Consultation on draft Action Plan
Fri 30th Dec Submissions on the draft Action Plan are due
January
ISC to finalise draft Action Plan
End January
Draft Action Plan presented to the Minister
February 2012 onwards
Staged commencement of work on actions contained in the Action Plan

In summary, the ISC will develop an initial draft Action Plan based on the material contained in the Outcomes Report, with input from stakeholders. That draft Action Plan will then be released for detailed stakeholder consultation. Based on this consultation, the ISC will then finalise the Plan and submit it to the Minister for Local Government.

The ISC envisages that work on many of the individual actions contained in the Plan will commence in February 2012. The ISC anticipates that many of the actions will require detailed examination and they will involve specific stakeholder consultation.

It is therefore important to appreciate there will be a number of opportunities for stakeholders to contribute to the development of the Action Plan and to then comment on the direction of the agreed actions as work proceeds.

the closing date for comments is close of business, Friday 4 November 2011.

Full version of circular and copy of report at

http://www.dlg.nsw.gov.au/dlg/dlghome/documents/Circulars/11-28.pdf

(emphasis added – reformwcc)

Posted in reform wcc | Comments Off

Change of date for Town Hall Glenn Mitchell, Max Hardy talk – Tues October 18

Posted by reformwcc on September 26, 2011

On behalf of a reader i asked Council which part of the Town Hall the Glenn Mitchell, Max Hardy talk will be held in.

Council have advised:

“Thank you for your email. The Town Hall talks will be held in the auditorium. Town Hall staff will be on hand to direct participants to the correct room.

Please note the Glenn Mitchell, Max Hardy talk has had to be moved to 18 October due to the change of the Council meeting evening. The correction will appear in the Advertiser this Wednesday.”

Presumably the same time 6.30pm-8.45pm

NOTE ALSO – You can now register online to attend this talk. Link at -
http://www.wollongong.nsw.gov.au/council/publicdocuments/Pages/Wollongong2022.aspx

Posted in reform wcc | Comments Off

Will Green Councillors implement NSW Green Policy on Precinct Committees

Posted by reformwcc on September 26, 2011

The first ordinary Council meeting is on Tuesday, so it’s down to business.

With two Green Councillors on Wollongong City Council, one to propose and one to second, there should now be no impediment for the Green Councillors to move a resolution to implement their local government policy on precinct committees.

We watch for developments with real interest (especially in the voting pattern of those who would oppose such a motion).

“Greens NSW Local Government Policy
Revised November 2010

Principles

The Greens believe that:

Community Consultation

50. Establishing precinct committees to expand community involvement in local government decision making;

http://nsw.greens.org.au/policies/local-government

Posted in reform wcc | Comments Off

WCC email addresses for new Councillors – not Lord Mayor

Posted by reformwcc on September 26, 2011

I suggest you make a copy of the WCC email addresses for our new Councillors (see url link below) before they decide they are getting far too much email for their ipads to deal with. Then some of the Councillors email addresses will probably become a lot more difficult to locate.

Email overload is a real problem, and ways have to be found to deal with it effectively. It is a challenge. More resources for Councillors by way of part-time personal assistants perhaps?

Disappointing to see the new Lord Mayor, Gordon Bradbury, has opted for the anonymous ‘records@wollongong.nsw.gov.au’ – that is, general mail, without any suggestion of saying “For attention of Lord Mayor”.

Hopefully when the WCC Lord Mayor has a new personal assistant (recently advertised) his Office will make itself more accessible to us e-people. “WCC – City of Innovation” – Your Worship.

See

http://www.wollongong.nsw.gov.au/council/council/Pages/default.aspx

Posted in reform wcc | Comments Off

Review WCC’s present Community Disengagement Framework

Posted by reformwcc on September 23, 2011

If we are to have a genuine flowering of local democracy in Wollongong as a result of the Wollongong Spring, the new Councillors must move fast to implement a genuine form of community engagement as part of Council’s organisational structure.

There has been a clear process of community disengagement since the ALP Councillors unilaterally abolished the former WCC Neighbourhood Committees.

First we had Local Area Meetings and these were replaced with Neighbourhood Forums. Both of these were designed to be toothless tigers with no real input into Council’s decision-making process, and no real resources to do their job.

If my recollection is correct, former Lord Mayor Darling wrote an opinion piece in the Mercury after the end of Neighbourhood Committees, saying Council needed “new ears”. Well, they certainly needed them since smashing their community hearing aids (in the form of WCC Neighbourhood Committees) left them floundering in their own wonderland.

But Darling and the ALP did not opt for new ears at all. Rather, they put their fingers in their ears and sang “La de da de da de da. Can’t hear you.“ to their critics.

Indeed, while Council attempted to dominate and limit the role of both these bodies (LAMs and NFs), it also made it explicitly clear that neither Local Area Meetings nor Neighbourhood Forums were ‘part of Council’.

How come? Disengagement is the answer.

The thinking involved in the design of these forms of community engagement are along the lines that, if you relabel ‘neutral’ as ‘drive’ on the metaphorical organisational gearbox, no one will notice the difference.

The fact is, under the present arrangements, there is no real, effective and best practice community engagement with Council. The mere appearance of community engagement is not to be mistaken for the reality.

After the ALP dominated Council was sacked by the NSW State Government, the State appointed technocratic Administrators and Council’s bureaucrats came up with a form of Community Engagement which serves their needs very well – sweet – but not those of people in local communities.

The needs of bureaucrats are to keep their workload to a minimum and to appear to comply with all the relevant legislative requirements. Those needs, while understandable in an organisation which lacks sufficient resources to deal with an active and engaged community, are not to be confused with what is needed for our communities to effectively deal with present and emerging challenges.

We have to end the pretences. No more of the empty “have a nice day” rhetoric of the equally facile and bureaucratic “Have your say.” Time for something real.

REVIEW NOT DUE UNTIL 2012

Despite a review of Council’s Community Consultation Policy under the Administrators, in the absence of elected Councillors, no real serious consideration was given to a return to bodies with the role played by WCC Neighbourhood Committees. The democratic spirit has been replaced by a bureaucratic one which fussed around with the edges of Neighbourhood Forums rather than seriously addressing the real issues (see below).

Under the present arrangements the next review of Council’s Community Consultation Policy is not planned until May 2012. Given the way Council staff have implemented similar Council resolutions for reviews this may well slip into 2013.

We can’t afford the delay.

In setting the time for the review at two years, the Administrators and Council officers had a timetable which saw the return of elected Councillors at September 2012.

In other words, what we have in the name of community engagement at the moment is not something which has been approved by the democratic process under the elected Councillors. Well, thanks to the Liberal State Government, democracy has been restored earlier than planned. Hooray for that!

Now it is time to for the newly elected Councillors – many of whom made community consultation and community engagement a prominent feature of their election campaign – to correct this by resolving to review Council’s Community Consultation Policy as a matter of the highest priority with the aim of finding and implementing the best practice forms of community engagement.

As is becoming increasingly clear to all, we have real work to do. We need the best form of Council organisation to achieve it.That means fully engaging our communities – and the return of a truly democratic spirit to Council-Community relations.

Bruce Reyburn
Coledale

ORDINARY MEETING OF COUNCIL
HELD ON
TUESDAY 25 MAY 2010

GENERAL MANAGER’S DEPARTMENT
ITEM 11 – COMMUNITY CONSULTATION POLICY REVIEW (CB-010.01.005) -
REPORT OF GENERAL MANAGER (JH) 15/04/10
61 RESOLVED UNANIMOUSLY that –
1 The community be consulted about potential revision of Neighbourhood Forum boundaries.
2 Council consult with the community in relation to membership attendance at Neighbourhood Forums.
3 Council continue to support and promote Neighbourhood Forums.
4 Council further develop e-consultation techniques.
5 Council update the Community Leaders Meeting with Administrators Charter to become the Neighbourhood Forum Leaders Meeting with
Administrators Charter.
6 Council promote Public Access Forums to encourage broad participation
by community members.
7 The Community Consultation Policy be updated –
a to differentiate between consultation opportunities and support
mechanisms; and
b to be reviewed every two years.

http://www.wollongong.nsw.gov.au/council/haveyoursay/Documents/Community%20Consultation%20Policy%20Review.pdf

Posted in reform wcc | Comments Off

NSW Planning Review – Wollongong Tuesday 4 Oct

Posted by reformwcc on September 22, 2011

From Planning Review website http://www.planningreview.nsw.gov.au/

“About the Review

As NSW residents, we all care about planning decisions which protect or change the regions, communities and streets in which we live. These decisions have a profound influence on where we work, live, play and shop. You can now take part in a once in a generation opportunity to completely review the system which guides how these decisions are made.

The State’s main planning law, the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act (the EP&A Act), was written in 1979.

The EP&A Act outlines how decisions are made about what people can do with their land. For instance, it allows councils to create local environmental plans (LEPs) which broadly define where and what development can take place. It also allows councils to prepare development control plans which typically provide more fine-grain detail which guide how developments can proceed.

The law is part of a much broader planning system, used every day to make decisions on issues ranging from home extensions to railway line extensions (and everything in between).

The NSW Government has decided that, given the length of time since the EP&A Act and its associated planning system were introduced, a comprehensive review is required.

The NSW Government has established an independent panel to review this law along with the broader planning system. The aim is to create a new planning system that meets today’s needs and priorities.

Community Consultation Process

The panel will be undertaking a broad community listening process throughout NSW from September to November, as part of the ‘listening and scoping’ stage of the review … These forums are open to everyone in the community – no registration is required to attend.

The consultation process will be an opportunity for individuals, interested community groups, local councils and their staff, property developers and anyone else who has an interest in the planning system to say what they think should be the broad objectives for the new system.

Illawarra Wollongong Session 1 4/10/2011 03:00 PM 05:00 PM Illawarra Leagues Club 97-99 Church Street Wollongong
Illawarra Wollongong Session 2 4/10/2011 06:00 PM 07:30 PM Illawarra Leagues Club 97-99 Church Street Wollongong”

http://www.planningreview.nsw.gov.au/Consultation/tabid/81/Default.aspx

Posted in reform wcc | Comments Off

Councillor Brown being disingenuous over former WCC Neighbourhood Committees

Posted by reformwcc on September 21, 2011

Councillor Brown was being more than a little disingenuous to suggest, on WIN TV news last night (Tuesday) that the former WCC Neighbourhood Committees were removed by a previous Council.

In doing that he added the full legitimacy of the former Council to something which was, in fact, very different.

The hard working WCC Neighbourhood Committees were removed by the ALP Councillors to silence their critics. And the ALP rush of blood to the head was particularly embodied in the form of Councillor Brown, who publicly poured scorn and loathing onto the hard working people who regularly attended Neighbourhood Committees in service to our communities.

Other Councillors, led by Councillor David Martin, went to real efforts to ensure that the WCC Neighbourhood Committees were not abolished and moved to have them reinstated pending a new model for Precinct Committees.

See what some Councillors actually proposed below.

Back then, in 2005, the ALP had the numbers – and, in the hands of Councillor Brown – numbing it was for the local democratic process. Every opportunity was treated as a threat unless it was approved – by non-democratic processes – by the party.

The WCC Neighbourhood Committees consisted of a well-informed section of our local communities – comprising mainly of people who had acquired over a decade of experience – meeting every month and having an in-depth knowledge of local issues and Council processes – and who also kept a watchful eye on Council.

From what Councillor Brown said on WIN TV he remains fearful of a well-informed and engagement citizenry. He said that the Neighbourhood Forums (which are not part of Council) should be issues based and there was no need for them to meet every month. That is, under the Brown model, they would meet on an ad hoc basis to talk about a particular single issue. Rendered tamer than tame.

And is his very partial recollection of past events the duplicitous standard of Council ‘memory’ which we can expect from Councillor Brown in his position of Wollongong City Council Deputy Lord Mayor? Probably. He is Old Wollongong seeking to regain to kind of power which previously resided in the ALP controlled Council.

In terms of setting directions into the future of Wollongong, we can look back on the rot which set into Council with the ALP caucus in control and in the absence of WCC Neighbourhood Committees. And make new plans.

New Wollongong is here – and in this New Wollongong we all know very well the crucial importance of having a well-informed citizenry made up of community oriented people who meet regularly at the local level to engage in Council-Community business.

What we now need is the next and 21st century model of Council-Community engagement which enables and empowers our local communities in Council’s decision-making process.

Exactly what form that takes is a matter for community consideration and agreement.

With the first normal meeting of the new Councillors coming up, we look with interest to see how the voices of a New Wollongong address this key matter.

Bruce Reyburn
ex WCC Neighbourhood Committee 2
Coledale

Ordinary Meeting of Council
28 November 2005 Page 3
Wollongong City Council
ITEM 2
REF: CM108/05
NOTICE OF MOTION – COUNCILLORS MARTIN, CARTAN, ANTHONY AND GRIFFITHS -
NEIGHBOURHOOD COMMITTEES
Report of Manager Administration and Information Technology (JKD) SU19331

Councillors Martin, Cartan, Anthony and Griffiths have submitted the following Notice of Motion –

“We, the undersigned Councillors, hereby give notice that we wish to move the following resolution at Council’s meeting on 28 November 2005 in relation to Neighbourhood Committees.

In light of Wollongong City Council’s adopted Draft Community Engagement Policy, and its instigation and support of the motion submitted to the Executive of the Local Government Association, which states –

‘That this Local Government Association (2205) call on the Federal Government to – 1 Promote the importance of “good practice” community engagement that ensures inclusiveness, appropriateness and accessibility.
2 Work with the Local Government Association to develop an approach to community engagement consistent with the United Nations Declaration on Community Engagement carried at the Engaging Communities Conference in Brisbane 2005.
3 Work with the Local Government Association to develop a community
engagement framework which contains policy and processes that can be
implemented in all Local Government Areas.’

We here move that –
1 So that there is continuity in Wollongong Council’s practice of formal engagement and consultation with our communities, Council re-instate Neighbourhood Committees on an interim basis, in their previous format, until Council adopts a new model for Precinct Committees.

2 The Working Party considering the future options for the proposed model of Precinct Committees, contain a minimum of five (5) representatives of the existing Neighbourhood Committees, to be nominated by those Neighbourhood Committees.
3 The Working Party seeks submissions from the broader community as to the preferred model for Precinct Committees.
4 The Working Party review the proposed boundaries of the proposed Precinct Committees, so that community interests and boundaries,

(ends – emphasis added – reformwcc)

And to remind yourself of the role of Councillor Brown and the ALP in unilaterally abolishing WCC Neighbourhood Committees see

http://reformwcc.info/2011/05/09/remember-this-how-we-loss-neighbourhood-committees-and-did-not-get-precinct-committees/

Posted in reform wcc | Comments Off

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.